![]() | ATT-Tactical™ - Serving Warfighters and Crimefighters since 1985 US Dept. of State ITAR / DDTC Registered Manufacturer DUNS 96-648-0345 CAGE 3BNS6 NY Contracts: # PC63486 #PC64787 #PC64783 NJ Contract: #74006 GSA Schedule: GS-07F-0093V / GS-07F-9029D FAR, FAR2 and SOP 00 11 -Compliant / WAWF - Compliant | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EXPORT (International) Orders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International Orders Due to ever increasing restrictions and procedures for exporting being place upon us by the US Department of State and the United Nations, we are forced to change our export policy as listed below. We highly encourage you to contact us before submitting the documentation to ensure that you have a full understanding of the progress and cost. Law Enforcement or Military: The minimum requirement for exporting will be $10,000 USD. Law enforcement agencies and military entities are encouraged to place orders for the quantities they would expect to required over the lifespan of their respective import permit, even if they only take actual delivery of a portion of the quantities specified in the documentation. In other words, the export processing fee will be same whether you order $10,000 USD or $100,000 USD of merchandise. Firearms and Components: All firearms, major part components (barrels, bolts, frames, lower receivers and cylinders) and any combination of minor components exceeding $100 USD require an export license issued by the US State Department. The export license is for the specific items and value listed on your purchase order and is valid until the export permit and/or import certificate expires. No changes can be made to your purchase order once the export license has been applied for. Because you are acquiring military grade weapons and military designated weapon accessories, you will need to provide us with your entity’s official “Purchase Order” as well as the bona fide end-user certificates
Applied Tactical Technologies, Inc.
Conditions, Fees and Payment
One time orders for:
In considering whether or not a shipment to your country will require an export license, we need to consider both WHAT is being shipped and WHERE it is going. Technologies subject to Export Control Laws are categorized on the following two lists: published by the US State Department in its International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) focused on potential military applications or technologies that are military in nature published by the US Commerce Department in its Export Administration Regulations (EAR) focused on "dual use" technologies having both legitimate commercial purposes and potential military applications In addition, under the provisions of the international Chemical Weapons Convention, the United States may require special declarations related to chemical shipments under either the ITAR or the EAR.CATEGORIES: INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN ARMS REGULATIONSU.S. Munitions List: (Link opens the State Department site in a separate browser window, see Part 121)
Ammunition/Ordnance Launch Vehicles, Guided Missiles, Ballistic Missiles, Rockets, Torpedoes, Bombs and Mines Explosives and Energetic Materials, Propellants, Incendiary Agents and Their Constituents Vessels of Tanks and Military Vehicles Aircraft and Associated Equipment Military Training Equipment Protective Personnel Equipment Military Electronics Fire Control, Range Finder, Optical and Guidance and Control Equipment Auxiliary Military Equipment Toxicological Agents, Including Chemical Agents, Biological Agents, and Associated Equipment Spacecraft Systems and Associated Equipment Nuclear Weapons, Design and Testing Related Items Classified Articles, Technical Data and Defense Services Not Otherwise Enumerated Directed Energy Weapons Submersible Vessels, Oceanographic and Associated Equipment CATEGORIES: Export Administration RegulationsBureau of Industry and Security Commerce Control List: (Link above opens the Commerce Department site in a separate browser window, scroll to Part 774. Links below open the individual sections of the Commerce Control List in a separate browser window.) Nuclear Materials, Facilities & Equipment (and Miscellaneous Items) Materials, Chemicals, Microorganisms, and Toxins Materials Processing Electronics Design, Development and Production Computers Part 2: Information Security Sensors and Lasers Navigation and Avionics Marine Propulsion Systems, Space Vehicles and Related Equipment In considering whether or not a shipment, transfer, transmission or disclosure will require an export license, we need to consider WHAT is being shipped, WHERE it is going, and TO WHOM it is being exported or disclosed. Certain destinations, organizations and individuals are subject to trade sanctions, embargoes and restrictions under U.S. law. If you intend to ship to a country, entity or person that appears on a restricted list, contact Rachel Claus, counsel@slac.stanford.edu. EMBARGOED OR OTHERWISE RESTRICTED DESTINATIONS, ORGANIZATIONS OR INDIVIDUALS
(15 CFR 744, Supp. 4 - pdf file) China, India, Israel, Pakistan, Russia (OFAC) Embargoed CountriesCuba, Iran, Syria, North Korea, Myanmar (formerly Burma) and Sudan
Liberia, Iraq, Zimbabwe, Balkans, Libya, Cote D'Ivoire (formerly Ivory Coast) and the Palestinian Territories See Sanctions Program and Country Summaries for more specific information.
Afghanistan, Belarus, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, N. Korea, Syria, Vietnam, Myanmar (formerly Burma), China, Haiti, Liberia, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan, Venezuela, or Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire), any UN Security Council arms embargoed country (e.g., for certain exports to Rwanda). A list of individuals who are denied export privileges by the Commerce Department Rev. December, 2006 The Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) recently released an advisory opinion stating that stab vests are classified under ECCN 1A005. That ECCN controls “body armor … not manufactured to military standards or specifications.” According to that advisory opinion:
This is an oddly-broad argument that would arguably classify as ECCN 1A005 an umpire’s vest or any other garment that provides any level of protection against any threat of bodily injury. More significantly, BIS’s analysis should have taken into account whether a stab vest poses any concerns with respect to the reasons for control stated for items classified under ECCN 1A005, namely national security and anti-terrorism. If the U.S. military were using knives to attack terrorists and foreign enemies, then there might be a reason to classify stab vests under ECCN 1A005. But last time I checked, our military was using, for obvious reasons, guns and other weapons against which a stab vest affords not a single ounce of protection. The advisory opinion is also hard to reconcile with an explicit exception set forth in ECCN 1A005 and not discussed at all by the advisory opinion:
This is clearly a reference to the bomb vests worn by law enforcement personnel who have the perilous job of defusing criminal explosive devices. Obviously, BIS felt that such vests aren’t of much use to foreign enemies and terrorists in defending themselves from our military, largely, I suppose, because only frontal protection is provided. But if such vests aren’t beneficial to those who would pose terrorism or national security threats, certainly stab vests are even less useful. (Frankly, a bomb vest such as described in the exception might be of some use to a terrorist engaged in making a bomb, whereas there appears to be little reason for a terrorist or an enemy soldier to wear a stab vest.) The BIS ruling seems even less justifiable in light of the reason for the current increased demand for exports of stab vests. The growth market for stab vests is in the United Kingdom, where knife violence is reaching epic proportions and where local governments are ordering stab vests for certain at-risk “front-line” government employees, including “emergency room staff, hospital porters, teachers, social workers and parking enforcement officers.” Needless to say, there are plenty of non-U.S. sources for these vests, and this advisory opinion will simply unfairly disadvantage U.S. companies in meeting this legitimate need for the stab vests.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||